Quantcast
Channel: Trade On Sports
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16

Backing the Underdog in MLB

$
0
0

Welcome to my new blog.

Now that the domestic football season has finished I thought I would start blogging again and share my thoughts and opinion on all things betting / trading related.

A lot of water has gone under the bridge since I last posted here back in September 2009 and it was around this time that I read a post from the excellent blog Green all over and the post can be found here
This post in itself completely changed my approach to betting  and what really piqued my interest here was the fact that in baseball  the very best teams rarely win more than 60% of the time so in effect any team can win any game.

If you are thinking of getting involved in the US Sports such as baseball always remember the following from Cassinis blog

In sports such as baseball, historical data shows that picking underdogs is the best way to "keep the wind" at your sports investing back. This may result in winning only 40%-45% of your selections, but the long odds means you'll have a positive return.

So let’s look at a realistic example. If you back a favourite in the baseball and want to show a reasonable return on investment of say 8% and you are backing favourites priced at 1.72 you are going to have to show a very unlikely 63% consistent strike rate and as we have seen the very best teams don’t produce this return consistently.

Now I know very little about baseball however, I do know about betting and this very information was enough to set me devising a relatively simple ratings system. During my initial experimentation the results were good and I found that opposing the home favourite that offered no value looked the best way to go forward. I also looked at opposing the away team that was favourite that showed no value but the results here were pretty neutral.

I then fully trailed these ratings last season and they produced a reasonable 22.50 Point profit but tailed off towards the end of the season shortly after the All – Star game.

Since then I have made improvements to the ratings system and I encouraged by the results looked at introducing the same principals to the NHL Ice Hockey and here again opposing the favourite has shown to be successful. I have found that if the ratings show there is value then opposing the favourite home or away has shown a nice profit of the results of which can be seen here . Interestingly if you would have backed the favourite that showed value you would only be up by 0.35 points.

I have also used this in the basketball and although this has shown a reasonable 14 point profit the only problem with this is that you still have the bookmakers overound to overcome as generally both sides of the spread are priced fewer than 2.00. However with the basketball I always ensure that I am receiving points and that my ratings are always highlighting at least 3 points value.

This season on the MLB the ratings are now up over 12 points after 92 bets and it is now my intention to do something with the Tennis. I do have someone who supplies me with some ratings for the ATP but I have yet to find the best way of utilising these so it is a work in progress.

Ultimately with the US sports and the tennis I hope to create a fund that will consistently return over 100 points profit a year. So far my return on investment is pretty good with the following.

NHL 163 Bets +33.13 Points ROI 20.32%

NBA 165 Bets +14.38 Points ROI 8.71%

MLB 92 Bets +12.76 Points ROI 13.86%

Combined 420 Bets +60.27 ROI 14.35%

Personally I prefer a style that is fairly selective that produces a reasonable number of bets and a reasonable return on investment as you do hear about certain Las Vegas gamblers who bet on anything that shows value.  Their points return maybe larger but they will be having significantly more bets and a losing run betting in this volume can seriously dent the confidence.

Finally I really like these ratings based systems because it takes out all of the emotion, energy and background noise involved in making a selection. Management changes and team line ups do not come into it. It is just a case of going with the numbers and at the moment it looks to be paying off.

If you would like to receive these ratings then details can be found here

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16

Trending Articles